tumblr hit counter

An Interview with Anonymous

Sep 29

Visit the main blog post (http://bit.ly/azgKeG) for up to the minute updates on the attack.

Over the past few weeks I have been investigating the Anonymous DDoS assault against media authorities around the world.  This small, but vocal Internet community launched an attack campaign called “Operation Payback”, which targeted DDoS attacks against various companies and agencies who support the anti-piracy lobby.   This attack, provoked by a similar attack carried out by an Indian firm against file sharing sites, caused the organizers of Anonymous to go nearly mental in rage.  Monitoring their communications over the past few weeks reminded me of the 1976 scene from the movie “Network”, where Peter Finch gets everyone to yell out of their windows, saying “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!”

Recruiting fliers (pictured below) were posted all around the world in multiple languages.  Sites like Reddit, Digg, 4chan, and Twitter were used to encourage thousands of people from all around the world to join in, stand up, and attack the anti-piracy lobby.

Anonymous Recruiting - English

Anonymous Recruiting - English

Anonymous Recruiting - Russian

Anonymous Recruiting - Russian

During my investigation, I got the chance to speak with some of the Anonymous organizers in a Q&A session.  Here is the result of that chat:

Q: Who is Anonymous?
A: I believe it is just a description of what we are. Anonymous is not an organization with hierarchy and leaders. We manifest as Anarchy. We are comprised of people from all walks of life. In short, we feel strongly motivated to do what we can to fight back against things which are morally questionable.

Q: What is your current mission?
A: To fight back against the anti-piracy lobby. There been a massive lobbyist-provoked surge in unfair infringements of personal freedom online, lately. See the Digital Economy Bill in the UK, and “three strikes” legislation in the EU which both threaten to disconnect internet connections based on accusations supplied by the music and movie industries. In the USA, a new bill has been proposed that could allow the USA to force top level registrars such as ICANN and Nominet to shut down websites, all with NO fair trial. Guilty until proven guilty! Our tactics are inspired by the very people who provoked us, AiPlex Software. A few weeks back they admitted to attacking file sharing sites with DDoS attacks.
We recommend reading our official statement here: http://pastebin.com/kD52Af4N

Q: Do you advocate piracy?
A: Yes. It is the next step in a cultural revolution of shared information. Imagine it as the beginnings to an information singularity; a beginning of true “equality of opportunity”, regardless of wealth or capacity. I would not have gotten anywhere near my accomplishments today without the books I pirated. I can’t afford them!

Q: What websites have you attacked?
A: The Motion Picture Association of America [MPAA], The Recording Industry Association of America [RIAA], The British Phonographic Industry [BPI], The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft [AFACT] ,Stichting Bescherming Rechten Entertainment Industrie Nederland [BREIN], ACS:Law, Aiplex, Websheriff, and Dglegal.

Q: Your original poster mentioned that “botnets” would be used in this attack. Do any of you profit from cyber crime?
A: That depends if you’re using the anti-piracy lobby definition of cyber criminal or not. To be clear, we do not condone any sort of profit from botnets or malware for that matter, but the vast majority of what is constituted as Cyber Crime can be something as simple as downloading your favourite song, instead of paying ridiculous fees for that song (which the artist will only see a fraction of).

Q: What’s your affiliation with 4chan? Are you all active members?
A: Some of us frequent 4chan, but we have no affiliation with any forum or website for that matter. We simply use them to communicate.

Q: How long will this attack go on for?
A: There is no time frame. We will keep going until we stop being angry.

Q: Are you prepared to go to jail for your cause?
A:
Yes, but we’ve taken every measure we can to make sure that our anonymity remains in tact.  More importantly, why isn’t this question asked to the very people who hired Aiplex to attack us in the first place?

Q: If you were able to resolve this situation, what would you want the respective media authorities of the world to do?
A: Personally, I would want them to basically go the fuck away altogether. Remove the barbaric laws they have lobbied for. Treat people like PEOPLE instead of criminals. Their long outdated traditional views on copyright infringement enforced solely by rich and powerful corporations need to be modified in light of the modern age on the Internet, the Information Age.

Artists under the media conglomerates have very little say in the content they produce and make a fraction of the profit. This is fairly evident with several mainstream artists who’ve now defected from the media regimes control. Take Nine Inch Nails and Radiohead as two great examples. Both groups have embraced piracy and have still continued to make a significant profit for themselves.

Q: Are you aware that this sort of attack is illegal in many countries and that your group can potentially put innocent people who support your cause under legal scrutiny?
A: I think that most people/participants are aware of that risk. In a world where our voice is ignored we feel we have no choice but to revert to direct action.

Q: Some people view this as the future of protests. Do you foresee future protests like this for other causes in the future?
A: Certainly. As for the protests, I hope the future of protests is ACTION. Not walking in circles with useless signs that are ignored.

There’s no telling how this protest will affect current and ongoing anti-piracy legislation, but one of the attacked companies (ACS:Law) is currently under investigation in the UK after a publicly available e-mail backup was uncovered by Anonymous, exposing thousands of victims to privacy invasion:

At the time of writing this blog post,  we observed a total of 474 hours of combined downtime and 623 separate service interruptions.  Aiplex, the Indian software firm tasked with attacking uncooperative file sharing sites was the most heavily affected with 313 service interruptions and 123 hours of downtime.   ACS:Law, the second most affected, experienced the largest bulk of downtime at 179 hours, with 152 separate service interruptions.

You can follow our frequently updated blog post on the attack here: http://bit.ly/azgKeG

Site Interruptions Downtime (h.m)
aiplex 313 123.00
ACS:Law 152 179.07
RIAA 104 127.00
AFACT 43 21.43
MPAA 3 23.20
DAVENPORT LYONS 3 0.10
IFPI 3 0.09
BPI 2 0.06
Totals Interruptions Downtime
623 474
Site Interruptions Downtime (h:m)
aiplex 313 123.00
ACS:Law 152 179.07
RIAA 104 127.00
AFACT 43 21.43
MPAA 3 23.20
DAVENPORT LYONS 3 8.55
IFPI 3 0.09
BPI 2 0.06
Totals Interruptions Downtime
623 482.40

Post to Twitter

  • (71) Comments

Comments

  1. This is the suitable blog for anybody who wants to seek out out about this topic. You notice so much its virtually laborious to argue with you (not that I really would want…HaHa). You definitely put a brand new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, just nice!

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Aiplex Software was hired by the likes of MPAA and RIAA to attack piracy sites. This instigated a retaliation which is currently in progress (www.aiplex.com is off-line as of this writing). So, which side wins [...]

  2. [...] anonymous Internet users behind “Operation Payback” aren’t done acting out; in an interview yesterday with the security experts at Panda Labs, one of the organizers said that Anonymous’ attacks [...]

  3. [...] “I would want them to basically go the fuck away altogether. Remove the barbaric laws they have lobbied for. Treat people like PEOPLE instead of criminals. Their long outdated traditional views on copyright infringement enforced solely by rich and powerful corporations need to be modified in light of the modern age on the Internet, the Information Age. Artists under the media conglomerates have very little say in the content they produce and make a fraction of the profit.” (Read on.) [...]

  4. [...] anonymous Internet users behind”Operation Payback”aren’t done acting out; in aninterview yesterdaywith the security experts at Panda Labs, one of the organizers said that Anonymous’ attacks [...]

  5. [...] an interview with Panda Labs, a member from Anonymous, the group behind the attacks that forced the RIAA and [...]

  6. [...] anonymous Internet users behind “Operation Payback” aren’t done acting out; in an interview yesterday with the security experts at Panda Labs, one of the organizers said that Anonymous’ attacks [...]

  7. [...] But those who thought that was just a short burst should think again – the group announced in an interview by security firm Panda Labs that this online guerilla fight will "keep going until we stop [...]

  8. [...] But those who thought that was just a short burst should think again – the group announced in an interview by security firm Panda Labs that this online guerilla fight will “keep going until we stop [...]

  9. [...] But those who thought that was just a short burst should think again – the group announced in an interview by security firm Panda Labs that this online guerilla fight will "keep going until we stop [...]

  10. [...] “Our mission is to fight back against the anti-piracy lobby. There has been a massive lobbyist-provoked surge in unfair infringements of personal freedom online lately,” the “Anonymous” spokesperson told Sean-Paul Correll of PandaLabs. [...]

  11. [...] i&#110formatio&#110 com&#101s via a&#110 interview &#98y securi&#116y firm Panda La&#98s &#119i&#116h s&#111me represen&#116a&#116ives &#111f [...]

  12. [...] But those who thought that was just a short burst should think again – the group announced in an interview by security firm Panda Labs that this online guerilla fight will “keep going until we stop [...]

  13. [...] To read the full interview, conducted by PandaLabs threat researcher Sean-Paul Correll, please visit this post. [...]

  14. [...] Imagenes de PandaLabs Fuente:PandaLabs [...]

  15. [...] Más información sobre los ataques pasados en TorrentFreak. Entrevista a miembros de Anonymous en el blog de Pandalabs. [...]

  16. [...] declararon algunos de los miembros de Anonymous en una entrevista concedida a Panda, el grupo se siente “fuertemente motivado para responder a aquellas agresiones que son [...]

  17. [...] desde la red. De manera anónima, descentralizada, sin una organización ni un líder detrás. Anonymous no es un partido, ni una empresa, ni nada que se le parezca. Una protesta genuinamente ciudadana, [...]

  18. [...] desde la red. De manera anónima, descentralizada, sin una organización ni un líder detrás. Anonymous no es un partido, ni una empresa, ni nada que se le parezca. Una protesta genuinamente ciudadana, [...]

  19. [...] Más información sobre los ataques pasados enTorrentFreak. Entrevista a miembros de Anonymous en el blog de Pandalabs. [...]

  20. [...] por muchas más webs y foros. En el blog de Pandalabs han hecho un completo seguimiento, además de entrevistar a uno de los cabecillas anónimos.Gracias a fidillo por el [...]

  21. [...] desde la red. De manera anónima, descentralizada, sin una organización ni un líder detrás. Anonymous no es un partido, ni una empresa, ni nada que se le parezca. Una protesta genuinamente ciudadana, [...]

  22. [...] Esta é parte da entrevista que o grupo deu à Panda Security, e que se encontra disponível em http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/an-interview-with-anonymous/. “Continuaremos até deixarmos de estar revoltados”, declarou o porta-voz do [...]

  23. [...] An Interview with AnonymousVisit the main blog post (http://bit.ly/azgKeG) for up to the minute updates on the attack. Over the past few weeks I have been investigating the Anonymous DDoS assault against media authorities around the world. This small, but vocal Internet community launched an attack campaign called “Operation Payback”, which targeted DDoS attacks against various companies and agencies [...] – 9 days ago [...]

  24. [...] os ponemos un seguimiento completo que de los ataques , que se ha realizado desde Pandalabs, y la entrevista en exclusiva a uno de los cabecillas del movimiento. Os dejamos un video de la repercusión en los [...]

  25. [...] és szövetségek honlapjait. "Most vissza fogunk vágni a kalózellenes lobbinak" – jelentette ki a csoport szóvivője a PandaLabs blogjának adott interjújában. Az Anonymous álláspontja [...]

  26. [...] Property Office, MPAA’s CopyProtected.com, and others. A spokesperson for Anonymous said in September that the group’s distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks would “keep [...]

  27. [...] fragment wywiadu z grupą przeprowadzonego przez Panda Security, który znajduje się na stronie: http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/an-interview-with-anonymous/ (wywiad w jez. angielskim)  „Będziemy działać, dopóki będziemy wściekli” – [...]

  28. [...] fragment wywiadu z grupą przeprowadzonego przez Panda Security, który znajduje się na stronie: http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/an-interview-with-anonymous/ (wywiad w jez. angielskim) „Będziemy działać, dopóki będziemy wściekli” – [...]

  29. [...] fragment wywiadu z grupą przeprowadzonego przez Panda Security, który znajduje się na stronie: http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/an-interview-with-anonymous/ (wywiad w jez. angielskim) „Będziemy działać, dopóki będziemy wściekli” – [...]

  30. [...] Jest to fragment wywiadu z grupą przeprowadzonego przez Panda Security, który znajduje się na stronie: http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/an-interview-with-anonymous/ [...]

  31. [...] Mientras periódicos como Europapress proclaman que anonimous abandona su ofensiva contra empresas hostiles a Wikileaks (intentando manipular a la gente para que deje de atacar) Desde anonimous se ha puesto otro objetivo: La SGAE ( ;P ) Anonymous, a través del imageboard 4chan y otros medios, ha convocado un ataque DDoS contra la SGAE. El ataque forma parte de la llamada Operation Payback, motivada inicialmente por el juicio contra The Pirate Bay y por los bufetes de abogados ingleses que se dedican a enviar cartas de amenazas legales a supuestos usuarios de P2P, exigiendo el pago entre 300€ y 600€ para evitar el juicio y repartiendo las ganancias entre los titulares de derechos, la empresa de monitorización y los abogados. Los ataques han golpeado la RIAA, MPAA, AFACT, ACS:Law, Gallant Macmillan, Ministry of Sound, Aiplex Software y otros.  Se rumorea que Anonymous planea atacar también al Ministerio de Cultura durante los próximos días.  Más información sobre los ataques pasados en TorrentFreak. Entrevista a miembros de Anonymous en el blog de Pandalabs. [...]

  32. [...] Entrevista a miembros de Anonymous en el blog de Pandalabs. [...]

  33. [...] Más información sobre los ataques pasados en TorrentFreak. Entrevista a miembros de Anonymous en el blog de Pandalabs. [...]

  34. […] protest in an increasingly digital era. In the case of Anonymous, this form of protest came about because of the banking blockade against WikiLeaks. While the protest was rooted in deceit (they used […]

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Become a fan!


    Panda Security on Facebook
  • Blogroll

  • Categories